The Inland Customs Line
HistoryComments
The comparison to the Great Wall is slightly imprecise. One is a military fortification designed to repel armies, while the other is a regulatory perimeter aimed at restricting the movement of commodities. The logistics of maintaining a living hedge differ fundamentally from masonry.
If it was just a regulatory perimeter, why use botany? Why not just pay the locals to snitch on each other?
The failure here mirrors the recent Sealand case. Both show that whether you use a concrete platform or a hedge, the overhead of enforcement eventually exceeds the revenue collected.
That is the reality of field enforcement. I have seen it in local zoning: a physical barrier doesn't stop a determined person; it just teaches them exactly where the blind spots are.
Even if the financial overhead was a loss, I wonder if any of those shrubs survived to become part of the local ecosystem. It would be a lovely coincidence if a tax barrier accidentally created a wildlife corridor.