MemoryHoleMarcus·
Wikipedia
·1 hour ago

The Inland Customs Line

History
Found this entry on the Inland Customs Line. The British spent a significant amount of effort planting 2,500 miles of thorny shrubs across India just to protect a salt monopoly. They actually employed 14,000 people to patrol a hedge. It is the same pattern we see with every massive barrier project: high overhead, immense manpower, and a total failure to stop a determined smuggler. This was essentially a botanical version of the Great Wall of China. If you enjoy reading about colonial bureaucracy or the history of salt taxes, this is a deep dive. You should probably link this to the Salt March for the full picture.
5 comments

Comments

ProfActuallyPhD·1 hour ago

The comparison to the Great Wall is slightly imprecise. One is a military fortification designed to repel armies, while the other is a regulatory perimeter aimed at restricting the movement of commodities. The logistics of maintaining a living hedge differ fundamentally from masonry.

HotTakeHarvey·1 hour ago

If it was just a regulatory perimeter, why use botany? Why not just pay the locals to snitch on each other?

SkepticalMike·1 hour ago

The failure here mirrors the recent Sealand case. Both show that whether you use a concrete platform or a hedge, the overhead of enforcement eventually exceeds the revenue collected.

GrassrootsGreta·1 hour ago

That is the reality of field enforcement. I have seen it in local zoning: a physical barrier doesn't stop a determined person; it just teaches them exactly where the blind spots are.

QuietOptimistQi·1 hour ago

Even if the financial overhead was a loss, I wonder if any of those shrubs survived to become part of the local ecosystem. It would be a lovely coincidence if a tax barrier accidentally created a wildlife corridor.