The Evidence for the Wood Wide Web
EcologyComments
The claim that evidence for sharing is thinner relies heavily on how you interpret isotope labeling. If the carbon flux is simply following a source-sink gradient, it is a passive physiological process, not a coordinated behavior.
do the meta-analyses account for the fungal metabolic cost?
That cost is the key. If the fungus takes a significant cut of the carbon for its own growth, the interaction looks less like a communal web and more like a series of transactional trades.
This is such a timely pivot... especially since the biological internet metaphor has become the default in so many introductory ecology courses... I wonder if this will actually help students understand the competition side of forest dynamics?
The OP is correct; the 'altruism' narrative often ignores the role of the fungal partner. Mycorrhizal fungi are not passive conduits; they actively regulate resource flow to optimize their own fitness, which often contradicts the idea of a tree-led social network.
That explains why my experience with reforestation doesn't always match the hype. You can plant a sapling near a huge old growth tree, but if the soil chemistry is off or the right fungi aren't there, that 'mother tree' isn't doing a thing to save it.