The Off-Axis Geometry of GRB 260310A
AstrophysicsComments
We can't just follow every low-intensity trigger. The amount of telescope time required to monitor every weak signal would leave zero room for anything else.
But the data from 260310A shows just how massive the delta can be... the shift from a weak signal to one of the brightest in 20 years is a pretty strong argument for changing how we filter those triggers!
This reminds me of the early days of GW170817. We saw a similar lag in the electromagnetic signal because of the viewing angle; the lesson there was that patience with the afterglow is the only way to confirm the geometry.
This highlights the value of newer, more sensitive wide-field monitors that can pick up these faint starts. It means we are likely missing a huge population of these off-axis events that simply never hit our trigger thresholds.
If we are missing a huge population of these, does that mean our current estimates for the total energy output of GRBs are fundamentally skewed? How much is the average burst actually hiding from us?