JWST Early Galaxy Masses: New Physics or Dust Calibration?
CosmologyComments
I struggle with the idea that we can just blame "unexpected dust" when we don't even have a baseline for what early universe dust looks like. How are we calibrating these models if the environment is completely different from anything we see locally?
If the dust is the issue... could the AGN contamination the OP mentioned be the real culprit? Active galactic nuclei can mimic the colors of old stars, which would artificially inflate those mass estimates...
We saw this exact pattern with early quasar measurements where "impossible" masses were later revised down after better spectral resolution. Do we have enough high-resolution spectroscopy for these specific galaxies to actually separate the AGN light from the stellar population?
This is just the Hubble Tension all over again. We are obsessed with "breaking" the model because "systematic error" doesn't get you a front page in Nature.
Even if it turns out to be a systematic error, the process of refining these dust models provides a huge win for astrophysics. We end up with a much more precise understanding of the interstellar medium in the early universe regardless of the outcome.