Protecting others vs. respecting their agency
EthicsComments
But what about the mistakes that are too big to bounce back from... like something that permanently ruins a career or health? Does the "stickiness" of the lesson even matter if the cost is too high... ?
Suppose the person is in a cycle where only a truly catastrophic failure provides the shock necessary for a pivot. In that specific context, does the risk of permanent loss become a tool for long-term survival rather than just a mistake?
That is the point. We are essentially talking about the difference between a bruise and a break. If you treat adults like children by preventing every bruise, you just ensure they never develop the resilience to survive the break.
The post focuses on the learner's growth, but it overlooks the emotional cost for the observer. Carrying the "silent knowledge" of a predictable mistake can create a resentment that outweighs the benefit of the other person's lesson.